Independent review of your analysis, tables, and reporting — flat pricing by complexity, a structured report mapped to your manuscript, no open-ended hourly clock.
A repeated-measures ANOVA was conducted (F(2, 42) = 4.81, p < .05). Effect sizes were reported as partial η² = .19, 95% CI [.04, .34], consistent with reporting guidelines. Post hoc comparisons were adjusted using no stated correction method.
These are the errors that get flagged in review — quietly fixable before submission, publicly embarrassing after.
Mismatched degrees of freedom between text and tables
Assumption violations never checked or never reported
Effect sizes reported inconsistently across the manuscript
Multiple comparisons run without correction or disclosure
Send the full paper, or just the methods and results sections, through a secure link.
A flat price based on analytic complexity, within 72 hours. You approve before any review starts.
Within 5 business days, every issue mapped to its exact page and table, with a suggested fix — not just "this is wrong."
Walk through the findings together before you submit.
One price, agreed before work starts. No hourly billing.
A redacted sample shows exactly what you get: each issue located in your manuscript, why it matters, and the fix — not a chat transcript.
Download Sample ReportMeasurement & Statistics · M.S. Teaching Physics
15+ years reviewing and analyzing data across IES- and NSF-funded research, spanning school psychology, counseling psychology, math education, computer science education, and law education.
AI helps this move fast — the checklist and the judgment are not automated. Every report reflects a direct read on what reviewers actually flag, built from years inside grant-funded research design and analysis.
AI can scan for surface-level issues. It won't reliably catch that your reported df doesn't match your N, or that a repeated-measures design needed a sphericity check it didn't get. This service is judgment-driven — AI helps move fast, but the checklist and the read are mine.
You get a short report confirming what checks were run and passed — useful documentation for a methods reviewer or committee, and cheap peace of mind before submission.
Yes. Manuscripts and data are used solely to complete the review, are never shared with any third party, and are deleted from all systems within 30 days of report delivery. A signed confidentiality agreement or NDA is available on request before any file is submitted.
That's a different, larger scope — reach out and it'll be quoted separately from the standard tiers above.